18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Continental PremiumContact 7


The Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the Continental PremiumContact 6 are both high-quality summer tyres, although there are some significant characteristics that set them apart based on various test results. These tests provide a clear view regarding their respective strengths and weaknesses, contributing to the overall verdict of each tyre.


The Bridgestone Potenza S001 showed decent performance in tests carried out by Autobild and ADAC. In a mutual test of 50 tyres by Autobild, it held a respectable 3rd position, outshining the Continental PremiumContact 6 which was right behind in the 4th position. Its strength was particularly seen in 'aquaplaning - cross', further demonstrating its high grip and stability in challenging wet conditions.


However, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 tyre has been outperformed by its competitor, the Continental PremiumContact 6, in several aspects. The PremiumContact 6 not only excelled in dry handling, mileage, and price/value, but also dominated in a mutual test by ADAC, taking the top spot among 16 tyres tested. This tyre was also highlighted for its excellent wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling, showcasing its superior performance under wet conditions.


Continental has gone a step ahead, with the Continental PremiumContact 6 now having been replaced by a newer model, the Continental PremiumContact 7, offering better performance and characteristics. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 still remains as an active model from Bridgestone.


When summing up the test results and customer feedback, it's clear that the Continental PremiumContact 6 offers a more balanced performance in various conditions and outperforms the Bridgestone Potenza S001 in several key aspects. Still, both tyres provide reliable performance and are esteemed products from their respective Continental and Bridgestone manufacturers.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
36
15
13
26
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
7.0
3.1
9.0
6.6
2.2
Latest test
2020
2023
2025
2020
2026
Available sizes
185
296
225
75
66

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
61%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
55%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
76%
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison